<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Whaling or not?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blingyou.net/blog/whaling-or-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blingyou.net/blog/whaling-or-not/</link>
	<description>The bling on the line!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 19:52:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlingYou</title>
		<link>http://blingyou.net/blog/whaling-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>BlingYou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 17:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blingyou.net/blog/?p=102#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Looks like we got into a whaling discussion here Lars :) One of my questions was why whales seem to have such a gathering of protectors, while other animals does not. Dolphins are protected, tuna fish is not. Whales are protected, cows and pigs are not. 

I do agree with the lack of market for whale products argument, and demand or the lack thereof has always been what decides production. Bar the Norwegian iron works, and whaling has also been subsidized for a number of years. Now, with the recent ban on seal products - I doubt if we will see much more seal hunting from our shores in the future. Personally I don&#039;t really care that much, and it has been years since I ate whale. I can easily go without it. 

Still, its puzzling why whales bring out such strong emotions in people, most of whom have never seen one in real life. As stated before, I think some of the environmental organizations has promoted the cause, and its not necessarily the animal that needs protection the most - but probably the most profitable animal to protect. Imho, anyway - your mileage may vary. Thanks for the comments :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like we got into a whaling discussion here Lars <img src='http://blingyou.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  One of my questions was why whales seem to have such a gathering of protectors, while other animals does not. Dolphins are protected, tuna fish is not. Whales are protected, cows and pigs are not. </p>
<p>I do agree with the lack of market for whale products argument, and demand or the lack thereof has always been what decides production. Bar the Norwegian iron works, and whaling has also been subsidized for a number of years. Now, with the recent ban on seal products &#8211; I doubt if we will see much more seal hunting from our shores in the future. Personally I don&#8217;t really care that much, and it has been years since I ate whale. I can easily go without it. </p>
<p>Still, its puzzling why whales bring out such strong emotions in people, most of whom have never seen one in real life. As stated before, I think some of the environmental organizations has promoted the cause, and its not necessarily the animal that needs protection the most &#8211; but probably the most profitable animal to protect. Imho, anyway &#8211; your mileage may vary. Thanks for the comments <img src='http://blingyou.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lars</title>
		<link>http://blingyou.net/blog/whaling-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Lars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 16:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blingyou.net/blog/?p=102#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Money in itself is nothing more than a tool. It&#039;s the way it&#039;s earned that’s important. I earn my money by making the world a better place to live, not to destroy it.

You wrote: &quot;Humans has been hunting whales for thousands of years...&quot; I am not talking about aboriginal sustenance whaling here. In Norway there&#039;s a myth that the whalers are only trying to feed their poor families by &quot;harvesting the nature&quot; blah, blah, blah. When it comes to tradition, the Norwegian whaling industry was responsible for developing the modern whaling methods that brought species to the brink of extinction. And have they learned from their mistakes? No. It&#039;s only the low demand for meat (and blubber or other products) and the international resistance that stops the catch quota from increasing even further.  

Next time, write more clearly. When I re-read and re-read, I see that you are referring more to the seals than the whales. 

That same ignorant, arrogant and imbecile argument has been used since back in the 80&#039;s, when in North of Norway it was &quot;Svart hav&quot; (No fish) because of human overfishing. Because of the lack of fish in the sea, the seals had to gather in the coastal areas to get food. The coastal fishermen then got the seals tangled up in their fishing nets and started to scream that &quot;the seals suddenly had become overpopulated and had vacuumed the sea&quot;. The truth was instead that the fleet of trawlers had done that vacuuming job.

There is a natural abundance in the oceans, enough for whales, seals and humans. Sadly the majority of humans on earth are so hungry after the mighty dollar, that they will ruin everything to get it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Money in itself is nothing more than a tool. It&#8217;s the way it&#8217;s earned that’s important. I earn my money by making the world a better place to live, not to destroy it.</p>
<p>You wrote: &#8220;Humans has been hunting whales for thousands of years&#8230;&#8221; I am not talking about aboriginal sustenance whaling here. In Norway there&#8217;s a myth that the whalers are only trying to feed their poor families by &#8220;harvesting the nature&#8221; blah, blah, blah. When it comes to tradition, the Norwegian whaling industry was responsible for developing the modern whaling methods that brought species to the brink of extinction. And have they learned from their mistakes? No. It&#8217;s only the low demand for meat (and blubber or other products) and the international resistance that stops the catch quota from increasing even further.  </p>
<p>Next time, write more clearly. When I re-read and re-read, I see that you are referring more to the seals than the whales. </p>
<p>That same ignorant, arrogant and imbecile argument has been used since back in the 80&#8242;s, when in North of Norway it was &#8220;Svart hav&#8221; (No fish) because of human overfishing. Because of the lack of fish in the sea, the seals had to gather in the coastal areas to get food. The coastal fishermen then got the seals tangled up in their fishing nets and started to scream that &#8220;the seals suddenly had become overpopulated and had vacuumed the sea&#8221;. The truth was instead that the fleet of trawlers had done that vacuuming job.</p>
<p>There is a natural abundance in the oceans, enough for whales, seals and humans. Sadly the majority of humans on earth are so hungry after the mighty dollar, that they will ruin everything to get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://blingyou.net/blog/whaling-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 08:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blingyou.net/blog/?p=102#comment-11</guid>
		<description>They hunt whale for the same reason you go to work: money, money and money. If you define my reasoning as ignorant and imbecile - thats your perogative, it does not make you right. Whaling is a job, its not a political statement - they do this for a living to support their families. Humans has been hunting whales for thousands of years, just like we have hunted other animals and have kept livestock for food and still do. 

Actually, Lars - when I spoke of &quot;eat up most of the fish&quot; I was talking about seals, not whales. I am fully aware of the diet of most whales, and I do not disagree that overfishing is the main factor in the decline in fish - but the end result is the same, though - not enough fish to feed all the seals will result in them starving to death.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They hunt whale for the same reason you go to work: money, money and money. If you define my reasoning as ignorant and imbecile &#8211; thats your perogative, it does not make you right. Whaling is a job, its not a political statement &#8211; they do this for a living to support their families. Humans has been hunting whales for thousands of years, just like we have hunted other animals and have kept livestock for food and still do. </p>
<p>Actually, Lars &#8211; when I spoke of &#8220;eat up most of the fish&#8221; I was talking about seals, not whales. I am fully aware of the diet of most whales, and I do not disagree that overfishing is the main factor in the decline in fish &#8211; but the end result is the same, though &#8211; not enough fish to feed all the seals will result in them starving to death.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lars</title>
		<link>http://blingyou.net/blog/whaling-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Lars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 04:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blingyou.net/blog/?p=102#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Whalers hunt for three reasons: Money, money and money. Since the whaling community don&#039;t want to be seen as greedy killers, they have invented some &quot;political correct&quot; reasons (or propaganda) to continue the hunt. Living in Norway, I have noticed that one of the most popular, ignorant, arrogant and imbecile excuses is the one also used in this blog entry: &quot;What happens if we do not hunt them? Well, basically they first eat up most or all the fish... blah, blah, blah&quot;. 

The fact is that the most of the whale species primarily eat plankton, krill etc. rather than fish. Human overfishing is the cause of the decline of commercial fish stocks worldwide, NOT THE WHALES. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3906775.stm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whalers hunt for three reasons: Money, money and money. Since the whaling community don&#8217;t want to be seen as greedy killers, they have invented some &#8220;political correct&#8221; reasons (or propaganda) to continue the hunt. Living in Norway, I have noticed that one of the most popular, ignorant, arrogant and imbecile excuses is the one also used in this blog entry: &#8220;What happens if we do not hunt them? Well, basically they first eat up most or all the fish&#8230; blah, blah, blah&#8221;. </p>
<p>The fact is that the most of the whale species primarily eat plankton, krill etc. rather than fish. Human overfishing is the cause of the decline of commercial fish stocks worldwide, NOT THE WHALES. <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3906775.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3906775.stm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
