<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for BlingYou</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blingyou.net/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blingyou.net/blog</link>
	<description>The bling on the line!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 00:40:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on People helping people by Emri</title>
		<link>http://blingyou.net/blog/people-helping-people/comment-page-1/#comment-3228</link>
		<dc:creator>Emri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 00:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blingyou.net/blog/?p=438#comment-3228</guid>
		<description>Great initiative and I hope they get much money to help the kids. I will try to pay a small amount :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great initiative and I hope they get much money to help the kids. I will try to pay a small amount <img src='http://blingyou.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The hunt for Roald Amundsens plane by National heroes are people too &#124; BlingYou</title>
		<link>http://blingyou.net/blog/the-hunt-for-roald-amundsens-plane/comment-page-1/#comment-3127</link>
		<dc:creator>National heroes are people too &#124; BlingYou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blingyou.net/blog/?p=343#comment-3127</guid>
		<description>[...] are very few things Norwegians are more proud of than our explorers. I have written about Roald Amundsen in this blog before, but this time it is our polar explorer, Nobel peace prize winner and all [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are very few things Norwegians are more proud of than our explorers. I have written about Roald Amundsen in this blog before, but this time it is our polar explorer, Nobel peace prize winner and all [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Protecting child victims of sexual abuse by BlingYou</title>
		<link>http://blingyou.net/blog/protecting-child-victims-of-sexual-abuse/comment-page-1/#comment-3125</link>
		<dc:creator>BlingYou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 01:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blingyou.net/blog/?p=419#comment-3125</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, the (/irony on) wise (/irony off) men and women of the European Parliament chose to use the &quot;revised&quot; text, so now child abuse material MAY be blocked if all efforts to delete it has failed. The abuse I think it is to allow it to be available online for all to see and use for sexual reasons is allowed to continue.

I am hoping for better laws on the protection of one’s personal integrity - and I hope the child victims sue the daylight out of the politicians that allowed them to be re-victimized like this. The lack of foresight and plain common sense should worry anyone living in a EU country. These people are paid very well to uphold and protect your interests - I feel that they are not. Not at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, the (/irony on) wise (/irony off) men and women of the European Parliament chose to use the &#8220;revised&#8221; text, so now child abuse material MAY be blocked if all efforts to delete it has failed. The abuse I think it is to allow it to be available online for all to see and use for sexual reasons is allowed to continue.</p>
<p>I am hoping for better laws on the protection of one’s personal integrity &#8211; and I hope the child victims sue the daylight out of the politicians that allowed them to be re-victimized like this. The lack of foresight and plain common sense should worry anyone living in a EU country. These people are paid very well to uphold and protect your interests &#8211; I feel that they are not. Not at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on When did chubby become &#8220;normal&#8221;? by Seline</title>
		<link>http://blingyou.net/blog/when-did-chubby-become-normal/comment-page-1/#comment-2974</link>
		<dc:creator>Seline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 23:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blingyou.net/blog/?p=370#comment-2974</guid>
		<description>Actually, poster, there are different ways to have excess skin, other than becoming fat. What about pregnancy? That causes excess skin because the skin is being stretched out. These women are not chubby-don&#039;t you know how hard it is to lose weight? Women over 40 have to go to a gym for an hour a day to maintain their current weight. Not everyone has the time or patience for that. Going to the gym for an hour a day and not shedding a pound? No way. Also, some people are just born like that. You know that disease where everything a person eats gets turned into fat? How are those people supposed to feel when they see all these skinny models walking around, knowing that they could never be like that? Imperfection is beautiful, and it&#039;s about damn time that it was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, poster, there are different ways to have excess skin, other than becoming fat. What about pregnancy? That causes excess skin because the skin is being stretched out. These women are not chubby-don&#8217;t you know how hard it is to lose weight? Women over 40 have to go to a gym for an hour a day to maintain their current weight. Not everyone has the time or patience for that. Going to the gym for an hour a day and not shedding a pound? No way. Also, some people are just born like that. You know that disease where everything a person eats gets turned into fat? How are those people supposed to feel when they see all these skinny models walking around, knowing that they could never be like that? Imperfection is beautiful, and it&#8217;s about damn time that it was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Protecting child victims of sexual abuse by BlingYou</title>
		<link>http://blingyou.net/blog/protecting-child-victims-of-sexual-abuse/comment-page-1/#comment-2959</link>
		<dc:creator>BlingYou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 00:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blingyou.net/blog/?p=419#comment-2959</guid>
		<description>I think you are touching on something important StraightGuy, our will to accept certain types of crimes, because we benefit from them ourselves, at the expense of others. We are, and I am really not including myself in this, willing to let the rights of some kids we don&#039;t know, or even better, that come from some country we have hardly heard of rather than accepting that our crimes might be detected. Its very double standard(ish) in my book, but even I have some skeletons in my closet. I too have downloaded some stuff over the years which its origin was.. unknown. Still, I think its time to allow laws to apply on the Internet as we would IRL, and I am willing and able to pay for whatever content I want to have.

The &quot;dissidents in china&quot;-card is always played when &quot;freedom of speech&quot;-advocates claim that any control, even that of limiting access to or preventing the distribution of, child abuse material, will be abused and our access to governmental critical information, religious material, stuff on abortion etc will suffer. I think that is a flawed argument and basically not true. If it is, prove it!

We have to allow some form of control and censorship on the Internet, just as we accept that not everything is published in our newspapers, books or shown on TV. Why are there no protests against editors in newspapers channeling and shaping information to fit their needs and views? I guess its probably because we accept that not all information is good information, and there are some things we just dont need to see or know - and we trust that the editors are using their good judgement in evaluating the information. I think the same should apply on the Internet - its basically just another media outlet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you are touching on something important StraightGuy, our will to accept certain types of crimes, because we benefit from them ourselves, at the expense of others. We are, and I am really not including myself in this, willing to let the rights of some kids we don&#8217;t know, or even better, that come from some country we have hardly heard of rather than accepting that our crimes might be detected. Its very double standard(ish) in my book, but even I have some skeletons in my closet. I too have downloaded some stuff over the years which its origin was.. unknown. Still, I think its time to allow laws to apply on the Internet as we would IRL, and I am willing and able to pay for whatever content I want to have.</p>
<p>The &#8220;dissidents in china&#8221;-card is always played when &#8220;freedom of speech&#8221;-advocates claim that any control, even that of limiting access to or preventing the distribution of, child abuse material, will be abused and our access to governmental critical information, religious material, stuff on abortion etc will suffer. I think that is a flawed argument and basically not true. If it is, prove it!</p>
<p>We have to allow some form of control and censorship on the Internet, just as we accept that not everything is published in our newspapers, books or shown on TV. Why are there no protests against editors in newspapers channeling and shaping information to fit their needs and views? I guess its probably because we accept that not all information is good information, and there are some things we just dont need to see or know &#8211; and we trust that the editors are using their good judgement in evaluating the information. I think the same should apply on the Internet &#8211; its basically just another media outlet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Protecting child victims of sexual abuse by StraighGuy</title>
		<link>http://blingyou.net/blog/protecting-child-victims-of-sexual-abuse/comment-page-1/#comment-2958</link>
		<dc:creator>StraighGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 10:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blingyou.net/blog/?p=419#comment-2958</guid>
		<description>There are many things to think about before accepting police to patrol the internet - among others - do we want to be controlled? Many of us are downloading stuff like music, movies, programs etc and can be found, prosecuted and punished just like the guys who want to look at pictures of abused kids. Its all crime, but on different levels - mind you - but still, its a criminal offense.

I think many people are scared of too much police on the internet because they are afraid of their own security, and to avoid any unpleasant rendezvouses with the police, they decide to oppose all policing. If this results in kids being re-victimized again and again by bad guys, so be it. It is, in their mind - not mine, a small price to pay to be able to access information for free.

Stating, what for me is the obvious, things like this might not be very politically correct, as I should say its because of dissidents in China and other oppressed people, but I basically think that most people think of themselves first and foremost. Its sad, really..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are many things to think about before accepting police to patrol the internet &#8211; among others &#8211; do we want to be controlled? Many of us are downloading stuff like music, movies, programs etc and can be found, prosecuted and punished just like the guys who want to look at pictures of abused kids. Its all crime, but on different levels &#8211; mind you &#8211; but still, its a criminal offense.</p>
<p>I think many people are scared of too much police on the internet because they are afraid of their own security, and to avoid any unpleasant rendezvouses with the police, they decide to oppose all policing. If this results in kids being re-victimized again and again by bad guys, so be it. It is, in their mind &#8211; not mine, a small price to pay to be able to access information for free.</p>
<p>Stating, what for me is the obvious, things like this might not be very politically correct, as I should say its because of dissidents in China and other oppressed people, but I basically think that most people think of themselves first and foremost. Its sad, really..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on When did chubby become &#8220;normal&#8221;? by Bee</title>
		<link>http://blingyou.net/blog/when-did-chubby-become-normal/comment-page-1/#comment-2844</link>
		<dc:creator>Bee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 23:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blingyou.net/blog/?p=370#comment-2844</guid>
		<description>I feel like you contradicted yourself in the above response. 
&quot;Should imperfection be the goal? Will we not fall short if we set our aims too low?&quot;
And also in the above responses you mentioned that you do not promote a perfect body type, but then later you say &quot;we allow ourselves to be less perfect&quot;. 

If we aim for this construct of perfect, we will absolutely fall short. As imperfect humans, if we try to reach any point of perfection we will absolutely fall short. You mentioned that above, but then contradicted yourself later.

Yes, we have an epidemic of obesity. However, why would someone even want to try to lose weight (besides health reasons) if they were striving to look like most of the models in magazines. If there is a perfection as you stated, most see it as being like a swimsuit model.  Most &quot;normal&quot; women will never get there. So, instead of being satisfied when they get to Lizzie&#039;s size, some might say what is the point and don&#039;t lose any weight whatsoever. I do realize that every situation is different, some people lose weight when they reach a certain high number, when they have a health issue, or because they just want to be healthier.. Whether the model in question is 180 pounds or 100, the message is never to have a healthy diet and exercise routine. It is absolutely about image and how clothes fit. 

I agree that an image should be a healthy one. However who am I, and who are you, to say that this woman is unhealthy. Because she looks a certain way? That&#039;s ridiculous. Healthy does not always mean that every muscle is tight and there is no flab. And you and I don&#039;t know what this woman eats on a daily basis or what kind of exercise she does. 

Also, to be specific. She is sitting down and leaning forward in the first photo. I would be willing to bet that most fit celebrities that are in magazines have a little bit of pudge there, it is just airbrushed out. Or, they would just never sit in that position at all in a magazine because it is an unflattering pose. I feel like the magazine wanted to showcase the fact that she had a little flab in the belly and put her in that position. Because, as you pointed out, she looks &quot;somewhat better&quot; in the second picture.

You are welcome to your opinions. I mean, that is why you have a blog. And there is nothing wrong with that. However, in general, we as people have to be careful not to put our own opinions out there as the absolute right one. To me, it reads that you have taken your opinions on your own body and health and applied it to this woman and anyone who has commented after. That is all fine as long as you know that others&#039; opinions and bodies are different and they might have different standards than you have. 

Personally, I think this woman is beautiful. And I cannot say if she is fit or not. She does have some flab, but I do not know one woman who does not have a little flab on her belly...and I know women of all ages, weights, and fitness types. I have also come to realize that almost every woman wishes they could change something about the way they look, and almost every woman is completely different in shape and weight distribution. So I cannot say who is more healthy than the other just by looking at them. A vision of health needs to be the role model, however I think we are a bit idealistic to believe that it is going to come from a fashion magazine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel like you contradicted yourself in the above response.<br />
&#8220;Should imperfection be the goal? Will we not fall short if we set our aims too low?&#8221;<br />
And also in the above responses you mentioned that you do not promote a perfect body type, but then later you say &#8220;we allow ourselves to be less perfect&#8221;. </p>
<p>If we aim for this construct of perfect, we will absolutely fall short. As imperfect humans, if we try to reach any point of perfection we will absolutely fall short. You mentioned that above, but then contradicted yourself later.</p>
<p>Yes, we have an epidemic of obesity. However, why would someone even want to try to lose weight (besides health reasons) if they were striving to look like most of the models in magazines. If there is a perfection as you stated, most see it as being like a swimsuit model.  Most &#8220;normal&#8221; women will never get there. So, instead of being satisfied when they get to Lizzie&#8217;s size, some might say what is the point and don&#8217;t lose any weight whatsoever. I do realize that every situation is different, some people lose weight when they reach a certain high number, when they have a health issue, or because they just want to be healthier.. Whether the model in question is 180 pounds or 100, the message is never to have a healthy diet and exercise routine. It is absolutely about image and how clothes fit. </p>
<p>I agree that an image should be a healthy one. However who am I, and who are you, to say that this woman is unhealthy. Because she looks a certain way? That&#8217;s ridiculous. Healthy does not always mean that every muscle is tight and there is no flab. And you and I don&#8217;t know what this woman eats on a daily basis or what kind of exercise she does. </p>
<p>Also, to be specific. She is sitting down and leaning forward in the first photo. I would be willing to bet that most fit celebrities that are in magazines have a little bit of pudge there, it is just airbrushed out. Or, they would just never sit in that position at all in a magazine because it is an unflattering pose. I feel like the magazine wanted to showcase the fact that she had a little flab in the belly and put her in that position. Because, as you pointed out, she looks &#8220;somewhat better&#8221; in the second picture.</p>
<p>You are welcome to your opinions. I mean, that is why you have a blog. And there is nothing wrong with that. However, in general, we as people have to be careful not to put our own opinions out there as the absolute right one. To me, it reads that you have taken your opinions on your own body and health and applied it to this woman and anyone who has commented after. That is all fine as long as you know that others&#8217; opinions and bodies are different and they might have different standards than you have. </p>
<p>Personally, I think this woman is beautiful. And I cannot say if she is fit or not. She does have some flab, but I do not know one woman who does not have a little flab on her belly&#8230;and I know women of all ages, weights, and fitness types. I have also come to realize that almost every woman wishes they could change something about the way they look, and almost every woman is completely different in shape and weight distribution. So I cannot say who is more healthy than the other just by looking at them. A vision of health needs to be the role model, however I think we are a bit idealistic to believe that it is going to come from a fashion magazine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on When did chubby become &#8220;normal&#8221;? by BlingYou</title>
		<link>http://blingyou.net/blog/when-did-chubby-become-normal/comment-page-1/#comment-2720</link>
		<dc:creator>BlingYou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blingyou.net/blog/?p=370#comment-2720</guid>
		<description>I think we define ignorance differently, I would rather say that you have another opinion than me - not that I am necessarily right or wrong.

And on the whole biology bit, how did it stretch in the first place? You are not born big skinned and grow into it over the years, one must actively stretch it - and when you decide not to be as big anymore, you may experience excessive skin. It’s better to not become fat before you become slender, no? Not being big in the first place will reduce or eradicate the problems of too much skin.

Should imperfection be the goal? Will we not fall short if we set our aims too low? I am not perfect in any way, but I would like to be. If my idols body wise are chubby, will I not be content when that is achieved? I think so, and my point was only that what we idolize should be healthy and well proportioned - not extra size and unfit, like most of us already are.

Ms Miller has become the postergirl for this discussion, but it really goes much wider. I find it problematic when a large percentage of children are downright fat, are lacking motor skills and will become diabetes 2 patients in the future. That is a societal problem that we need to fix, if we are to have any chance of sustaining human life on this planet.  BTW, speaking of planets; have you seen Wall-E? The future of the human race is bleak.. ;)

Many people like imperfect people, be them short, tall, fat, skinny or otherwise different from the norm - its the beauty of humans, there is someone out there for most of us. I am not advocating beauty and perfection, I am promoting healthy idols. That is a totally different thing than promoting the stride for perfection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we define ignorance differently, I would rather say that you have another opinion than me &#8211; not that I am necessarily right or wrong.</p>
<p>And on the whole biology bit, how did it stretch in the first place? You are not born big skinned and grow into it over the years, one must actively stretch it &#8211; and when you decide not to be as big anymore, you may experience excessive skin. It’s better to not become fat before you become slender, no? Not being big in the first place will reduce or eradicate the problems of too much skin.</p>
<p>Should imperfection be the goal? Will we not fall short if we set our aims too low? I am not perfect in any way, but I would like to be. If my idols body wise are chubby, will I not be content when that is achieved? I think so, and my point was only that what we idolize should be healthy and well proportioned &#8211; not extra size and unfit, like most of us already are.</p>
<p>Ms Miller has become the postergirl for this discussion, but it really goes much wider. I find it problematic when a large percentage of children are downright fat, are lacking motor skills and will become diabetes 2 patients in the future. That is a societal problem that we need to fix, if we are to have any chance of sustaining human life on this planet.  BTW, speaking of planets; have you seen Wall-E? The future of the human race is bleak.. <img src='http://blingyou.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Many people like imperfect people, be them short, tall, fat, skinny or otherwise different from the norm &#8211; its the beauty of humans, there is someone out there for most of us. I am not advocating beauty and perfection, I am promoting healthy idols. That is a totally different thing than promoting the stride for perfection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on When did chubby become &#8220;normal&#8221;? by Awakening</title>
		<link>http://blingyou.net/blog/when-did-chubby-become-normal/comment-page-1/#comment-2719</link>
		<dc:creator>Awakening</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 07:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blingyou.net/blog/?p=370#comment-2719</guid>
		<description>Let me enlighten the ignorance here,
This young woman is not overweight. Are you familiar with biology? You know, cells, the ...human tissue,  etc. Well believe it or not, kids, when the skin has been stretched to a certain point, its elasticity stretches and stays. It&#039;s clear by this woman&#039;s stomach that the skin has surpassed the &quot;bounce back&quot; stage.
No matter how much exercise this woman does, her stomach will never be tight and taught naturally.
Fitness models and the &quot;healthy&quot; people you see in health magazines posess traits that are just as uncommon and unattainable as fashion models.
Sure, it would do all us media gluttons good to see healthier, more active looking people representing ourselves, but come on people-showing average bodies like Lizzie Miller&#039;s is nothing but a positive thing-girls and women alike see that it&#039;s NORMAL to not have a perfect body-whether it be boney or buff. Because sometimes, you can&#039;t get rid of those muffintops-no matter how hard you try. It&#039;s about time we are beginning to see IMPERFECTION as a beautiful...about damn time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me enlighten the ignorance here,<br />
This young woman is not overweight. Are you familiar with biology? You know, cells, the &#8230;human tissue,  etc. Well believe it or not, kids, when the skin has been stretched to a certain point, its elasticity stretches and stays. It&#8217;s clear by this woman&#8217;s stomach that the skin has surpassed the &#8220;bounce back&#8221; stage.<br />
No matter how much exercise this woman does, her stomach will never be tight and taught naturally.<br />
Fitness models and the &#8220;healthy&#8221; people you see in health magazines posess traits that are just as uncommon and unattainable as fashion models.<br />
Sure, it would do all us media gluttons good to see healthier, more active looking people representing ourselves, but come on people-showing average bodies like Lizzie Miller&#8217;s is nothing but a positive thing-girls and women alike see that it&#8217;s NORMAL to not have a perfect body-whether it be boney or buff. Because sometimes, you can&#8217;t get rid of those muffintops-no matter how hard you try. It&#8217;s about time we are beginning to see IMPERFECTION as a beautiful&#8230;about damn time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Protecting child victims of sexual abuse by BlingYou</title>
		<link>http://blingyou.net/blog/protecting-child-victims-of-sexual-abuse/comment-page-1/#comment-2718</link>
		<dc:creator>BlingYou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 22:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blingyou.net/blog/?p=419#comment-2718</guid>
		<description>I agree completely with you Hank - there is a need for this to be controlled in some way, like the police or whoever does this are controlled today. There are laws and regulations that must be respected when you introduce something that limits the access to information on the Internet, just like there are laws and regulations that limit what we can read in the paper or in books. For me, the Internet is nothing other than a service provided to us, and a service we expect to work - much like electricity or water. I would not like it if people could tap into the water supply and add various poisons or other bad stuff without my knowledge. Before you know it, you have worms coming out your fosset :) Its here where the control mechanisms comes into play, stopping just that from happening while at the same time making sure that I do get the water I want. Anyway, l hope they manage to get this pretty low level of regulation in order. I will have no problem living with something like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree completely with you Hank &#8211; there is a need for this to be controlled in some way, like the police or whoever does this are controlled today. There are laws and regulations that must be respected when you introduce something that limits the access to information on the Internet, just like there are laws and regulations that limit what we can read in the paper or in books. For me, the Internet is nothing other than a service provided to us, and a service we expect to work &#8211; much like electricity or water. I would not like it if people could tap into the water supply and add various poisons or other bad stuff without my knowledge. Before you know it, you have worms coming out your fosset <img src='http://blingyou.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Its here where the control mechanisms comes into play, stopping just that from happening while at the same time making sure that I do get the water I want. Anyway, l hope they manage to get this pretty low level of regulation in order. I will have no problem living with something like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

